<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Haven&#8217;t seen Watchmen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socksandbarney.com/2009/04/07/havent-seen-watchmen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socksandbarney.com/2009/04/07/havent-seen-watchmen/</link>
	<description>The Online Comic for Political and Non-Political Animals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:40:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: king area 51</title>
		<link>http://www.socksandbarney.com/2009/04/07/havent-seen-watchmen/comment-page-1/#comment-8526</link>
		<dc:creator>king area 51</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socksandbarney.com/2009/04/07/havent-seen-watchmen/#comment-8526</guid>
		<description>idk what the hell you guys are talking about, the comic was a 10 and the movie was fantastic, well you know some don&#039;t have good taste in movies!!!! like you guys!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>idk what the hell you guys are talking about, the comic was a 10 and the movie was fantastic, well you know some don&#8217;t have good taste in movies!!!! like you guys!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BWM</title>
		<link>http://www.socksandbarney.com/2009/04/07/havent-seen-watchmen/comment-page-1/#comment-4457</link>
		<dc:creator>BWM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 05:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socksandbarney.com/2009/04/07/havent-seen-watchmen/#comment-4457</guid>
		<description>I never read the comic, but the movie, regardless of how true it is to said comic, has no literary worth whatsoever. Poor character development that was actually irrelevant to the story at hand coupled with a story that was, itself, cliche and uninspired pretty much ruined my afternoon. So, honestly, that&#039;s not a concern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never read the comic, but the movie, regardless of how true it is to said comic, has no literary worth whatsoever. Poor character development that was actually irrelevant to the story at hand coupled with a story that was, itself, cliche and uninspired pretty much ruined my afternoon. So, honestly, that&#8217;s not a concern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phill Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.socksandbarney.com/2009/04/07/havent-seen-watchmen/comment-page-1/#comment-4441</link>
		<dc:creator>Phill Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socksandbarney.com/2009/04/07/havent-seen-watchmen/#comment-4441</guid>
		<description>I felt the film was dissappointing less because of its slavishness and more because it is simply out of its time.  I have reread the book since and it so powerfully captures the sense of almost claustrophobic fear that one felt in the cold war I dont think anyone born after about 1980 can really get it (I am at last become an Oldie...*sigh)

Also, the &quot;new&quot; ending was as naive and unlikely as the original was (sorry Big Al&#039;, but it was...)

Phill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I felt the film was dissappointing less because of its slavishness and more because it is simply out of its time.  I have reread the book since and it so powerfully captures the sense of almost claustrophobic fear that one felt in the cold war I dont think anyone born after about 1980 can really get it (I am at last become an Oldie&#8230;*sigh)</p>
<p>Also, the &#8220;new&#8221; ending was as naive and unlikely as the original was (sorry Big Al&#8217;, but it was&#8230;)</p>
<p>Phill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.socksandbarney.com/2009/04/07/havent-seen-watchmen/comment-page-1/#comment-4382</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 01:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socksandbarney.com/2009/04/07/havent-seen-watchmen/#comment-4382</guid>
		<description>Meh, it was a better action-adventure story, but less impressive as a work of art. And they really did lose something by not properly explaining Manhattan&#039;s sense of time - those scenes just felt like normal flashbacks.

I saw it mostly because I thought 300 was one of the most beautifully pure movies I have ever seen, even with the bad acting and dialog. I thought he deserved a shot, and he did as good of a job as I expected anyone to be able to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh, it was a better action-adventure story, but less impressive as a work of art. And they really did lose something by not properly explaining Manhattan&#8217;s sense of time &#8211; those scenes just felt like normal flashbacks.</p>
<p>I saw it mostly because I thought 300 was one of the most beautifully pure movies I have ever seen, even with the bad acting and dialog. I thought he deserved a shot, and he did as good of a job as I expected anyone to be able to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flink</title>
		<link>http://www.socksandbarney.com/2009/04/07/havent-seen-watchmen/comment-page-1/#comment-4370</link>
		<dc:creator>Flink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socksandbarney.com/2009/04/07/havent-seen-watchmen/#comment-4370</guid>
		<description>Hold up, can anyone honestly say they wouldn&#039;t be psyched to see/hear a operatic/radio adaptation of Watchmen?  That would be AWESOME.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold up, can anyone honestly say they wouldn&#8217;t be psyched to see/hear a operatic/radio adaptation of Watchmen?  That would be AWESOME.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yorksdevil</title>
		<link>http://www.socksandbarney.com/2009/04/07/havent-seen-watchmen/comment-page-1/#comment-4367</link>
		<dc:creator>yorksdevil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socksandbarney.com/2009/04/07/havent-seen-watchmen/#comment-4367</guid>
		<description>Surely you only have to read &quot;directed by Zack Snyder&quot; to know why you don&#039;t want to see Watchmen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely you only have to read &#8220;directed by Zack Snyder&#8221; to know why you don&#8217;t want to see Watchmen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vitamin D</title>
		<link>http://www.socksandbarney.com/2009/04/07/havent-seen-watchmen/comment-page-1/#comment-4360</link>
		<dc:creator>Vitamin D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 11:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socksandbarney.com/2009/04/07/havent-seen-watchmen/#comment-4360</guid>
		<description>The movie couldn&#039;t (or at least didn&#039;t try very hard to) capture Dr. Manhattan&#039;s sense of time as well as the comic did. I can&#039;t be sure whether it was the fault of the medium, or of a desire to make it less confusing for the average movie-goer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The movie couldn&#8217;t (or at least didn&#8217;t try very hard to) capture Dr. Manhattan&#8217;s sense of time as well as the comic did. I can&#8217;t be sure whether it was the fault of the medium, or of a desire to make it less confusing for the average movie-goer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

