<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Clinton&#8217;s RFK crazytalk&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socksandbarney.com/2008/05/27/on-clintons-rfk-crazytalk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socksandbarney.com/2008/05/27/on-clintons-rfk-crazytalk/</link>
	<description>The Online Comic for Political and Non-Political Animals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:40:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DT</title>
		<link>http://www.socksandbarney.com/2008/05/27/on-clintons-rfk-crazytalk/comment-page-1/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator>DT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 12:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socksandbarney.com/2008/05/27/on-clintons-rfk-crazytalk/#comment-686</guid>
		<description>&quot;And most importantlyâ€¦ She will lie, cheat and steal to win the nomination and the presidency. Rightly, she believes this is an asset against McCain.&quot;

It is never an asset to me, vs. McCain or anyone else.  If she will do this to McCain, she&#039;ll do it to the American people if she gets elected.  If the people can&#039;t have even the most basic amount of trust in a candidate, that candidate shouldn&#039;t be President.  Seems pretty simple to me.

I find it sad that one of the principles I value in a candidate the most is the least likely to be the one I&#039;ll get on the campaign trail.  That principle is: honesty.  Even when it hurts or isn&#039;t what the people want to hear, it&#039;s what we ought to have.  Too many people would rather have sunshine blown up their *** these days, but who started that?  Politicians --telling us what we wanted to hear, even when they knew reality was different, and that has perpetuated the cycle.  Promising us the moon, even when we knew it couldn&#039;t happen (though deluding ourselves sometimes seems to be a national pastime).

I guess that there are two solutions to this problem:  One --we need politicians that will tell us the truth.  But to get that, we need solution number two:  We need to stop &quot;drinking the sand&quot; we&#039;re told is water, and demand honesty from them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And most importantlyâ€¦ She will lie, cheat and steal to win the nomination and the presidency. Rightly, she believes this is an asset against McCain.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is never an asset to me, vs. McCain or anyone else.  If she will do this to McCain, she&#8217;ll do it to the American people if she gets elected.  If the people can&#8217;t have even the most basic amount of trust in a candidate, that candidate shouldn&#8217;t be President.  Seems pretty simple to me.</p>
<p>I find it sad that one of the principles I value in a candidate the most is the least likely to be the one I&#8217;ll get on the campaign trail.  That principle is: honesty.  Even when it hurts or isn&#8217;t what the people want to hear, it&#8217;s what we ought to have.  Too many people would rather have sunshine blown up their *** these days, but who started that?  Politicians &#8211;telling us what we wanted to hear, even when they knew reality was different, and that has perpetuated the cycle.  Promising us the moon, even when we knew it couldn&#8217;t happen (though deluding ourselves sometimes seems to be a national pastime).</p>
<p>I guess that there are two solutions to this problem:  One &#8211;we need politicians that will tell us the truth.  But to get that, we need solution number two:  We need to stop &#8220;drinking the sand&#8221; we&#8217;re told is water, and demand honesty from them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

